86 The Ombudsman Denies It Acted Corruptly (2): 7 November 2024

This is a copy of the email I received today (Thursday 7 November 2024) at 10.41 am from “Alison, Assistant Director, Industry Investigation/ Investigations Branch” at the Commonwealth Ombudsman.  The email attached a letter dated 5 November 2024 from Commonwealth Ombudsman Iain Anderson.

RE: [External] FW: HCF Misconduct in Relation to Lift Cancer Care Services Hankinredden Blogs 2024-803716 [SEC=OFFICIAL]

Private Health Insurance Ombudsman  phi@ombudsman.gov.au

To: John Hankin

 

 

Dear Mr Hankin

 

Please see attached response from Iain Anderson, Ombudsman.

 

Kind regards,

 

 



Alison (she/her)

Assistant Director

Industry Investigations / Investigations Branch

Proud to be working on the lands of the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation.

A black and white logo

Description automatically generated

1300 362 072

phi@ombudsman.gov.au

ombudsman.gov.au  

Level 5, 14 Childers St Canberra ACT 2600

The Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman acknowledges the Traditional Owners of country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to land, culture and community. We pay our respects to Elders past and present.

Artwork by Kevin Bynder, Whadjuk Nyungar Badimia Yamatji Artist.

The obsession of the Ombudsman with the external trappings of politically correct behaviour is clear from the amount of space taken up by acknowledging the local Aboriginal communities in the email sign off.  It is a pity the Ombudsman obsesses so much about acknowledging local Aboriginal communities instead of stopping health insurers from ignoring the law.

****

This is a copy of the letter that was enclosed with the email received today.

COMMONWEALTH

OMBUDSMAN

 

2024-803176 Hankin

5 November 2024

Mr Hankin via email:

Dear Mr Hankin

Thank you for your email of 10 October 2024.

I am very sorry to hear of the passing of your wife Margaret on 22 August 2023.

I understand that you have published details of your complaints with this Office on your website www.hankinredden.au. In your blog you expressed your view that the Office acted corruptly and incompetently in handling your case.

 I have previously acknowledged that the time taken by my Office to investigate your case was not satisfactory, and I apologised for this in my letter to you of 31 March 2023.

You remain of the view that staff of this Office acted corruptly. As you note in your email to me, we disagree on this. As a result of the investigation of your complaint against HCF and the Department of Health and Aged Care:

·         HCF confirmed it would pay Type C claims received from Lift Cancer Care going forward

·         I advised Directors of Members Health Fund Alliance insurers, including HCF, of their legal obligation to pay certified claims going forward when I spoke at their annual conference on 7 February 2023

·         I raised this issue with the CEO of the Australian Private Hospitals Association on 24 February 2023, with the CEO of Private Healthcare Australia on 1 March 2023, and with the Secretary of the Department of Health and Aged Care on 20 March 2023

·         I published a report “Can private health insurers decide that a patient does not need treatment in hospital? - Paying Type C claims: observations of the private health insurance industry” in February 2024, providing guidance to private health insurers on best practice when handling Type C claims and reminding them of their legal obligations

·         The Department of Health and Aged Care confirmed it is working on amendments to the Health Insurance Act 1973 that will encourage better certification processes for hospital admission by medical practitioners and hospitals; and expand the authority and functions of the Professional Services Review when certifying that Type C treatments or procedures must take place in hospital.

My Office has continued to monitor complaints we received regarding Type C claims. Since your matter was closed, the number of complaints about this issue declined rapidly and continues to stay low, which suggests an ongoing improvement in how Type C claims are being handled by the private health insurance industry.

I recognise you do not agree with my views. You have the right to express your disagreement, including by making public statements on your blog and publishing correspondence to you from this Office. You also have the right to refer your views to the National Anti-Corruption Commission, if you wish to allege corrupt behaviour.

However, I request that in your comments on your blog, as well as if you publish correspondence from this Office, you do not publish the unredacted full names and email addresses of the junior complaint handling staff who dealt with your matter.

Unfortunately, publishing the full names and contact details of junior staff exposes them to a range of behaviour on social media and elsewhere which in my view is not reasonable or appropriate.

I would be happy to discuss this with you further, if that would assist your consideration of my request.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Iain Anderson

Commonwealth Ombudsman

 

Helping people, improving government

1300 362 072 ombudsman.gov.au GPO Box 442, Canberra ACT 2601

****

Iain Anderson lists a number of things which he says took place “As a result of the investigation of your complaint against HCF and the Department of Health and Aged Care”.

By the time Mr Anderson took up his appointment as Ombudsman, I had already bludgeoned the health insurers into obeying the law.  Perhaps my letters to Mr Anderson spurred Mr Anderson personally into action, but my complaints to the Ombudsman as a government agency resulted in nothing except a refusal by the Ombudsman as an agency to do its job.

Mr Anderson lists four separate actions which he personally took.  If that has the effect of encouraging obedience of the law by the health insurers, that is good – but I doubt this will happen.  Mr Anderson says

·      The Department of Health and Aged Care confirmed it is working on amendments to the Health Insurance Act 1973 that will encourage better certification processes for hospital admission by medical practitioners and hospitals; and expand the authority and functions of the Professional Services Review when certifying that Type C treatments or procedures must take place in hospital.

If the Health Department is working on amendments to the Health Insurance Act, I assume it is doing this solely to justify the conduct of the health insurers.  The existing Type C certificate requirements have operated for some years and are very clear in what is needed.  Despite this the Health Department – I believe at the behest of senior bureaucrat Penny Shakespeare – refused to do anything when the health insurers ignored the law.

I appreciate Iain Anderson trying to clean up the scandal and protect the bureaucrats he supervises at the Ombudsman – but unless proper criminal investigations take place and unless charges are laid, nothing will ever change.  If criminals get off scot free, they continue to commit their crimes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog